Weekly Poll

Should Wyoming bring its wolf plan in line with surrounding states?
 

Weather

Today's Front Page

Advertisement

Sports

Advertisement

Family

Advertisement

Business Directory

Advertisement
Advertisement

Home
Distemper devastates Yellowstone wolves Print E-mail
Written by Gib Mathers    Thursday, March 19, 2009

Distemper, an often fatal disease common in carnivores, had a devastating effect on Yellowstone National Park wolves last year,  especially northern packs. But the disease may have run its course, a Yellowstone official said.

Across the park, the population has declined 27 percent, from 171 wolves in 2007 to 124 in 2008.

Wolf numbers dropped by 40 percent in the northern range, the most concentrated wolf community, from 94 wolves in 2007 to 56 wolves in 2008, said Yellowstone Wolf Project Leader Doug Smith.

Distemper is more likely to spread in denser populations such as the northern range, Smith said.

In the interior, the decline was 11 percent — from 77 in 2007 to 68 in 2008, Smith said.

Puppies are the most susceptible to the viral disease, which affects respiratory, gastrointestinal and central nervous systems. But adults can contract the disease too, through secretions, especially saliva.

Distemper was here long before wolves arrived in Yellowstone in 1995, and the disease is spread by all predators, Smith said. Other carnivores can spread the disease from chewing on the same carcass.

Eight puppies were born in the northern range and 14 in the interior last year, Smith said.

Inoculating for distemper requires three injections. That would be expensive, and catching all the wolves in the park likely would not be possible, he said.

The good news is the 2008 distemper outbreak probably is over, he said.

Smith said he believes the population can recover. Distemper clobbered park wolves In 1999 and 2005 as well.
“Both times, they bounced back,” he said.

Mange also killed two or three wolves in 2008. Currently, 20 wolves are suffering from mange across the park, Smith said.

“It’s the worst year yet for mange,” Smith said, adding he hopes it does not increase this year.

Mange is a parasitic infection of the skin. It can weaken the animal, making it susceptible to infections and other problems that can lead to death, a Yellowstone news release said.

The number of breeding pairs dropped from 10 to six in 2008. That’s the lowest since 2000, the news release said.

Distemper and mange aren’t the only slayers.

Wolves often kill each other competing for food or territory, and population density could contribute to an increase in wolf-on-wolf mortality, the release said.

A mountain lion will kill a wolf occasionally, but the only unequivocal wolf predators are humans, Smith said.

Wildlife biologists say the Yellowstone wolf population has recovered, and wolf numbers can be expected to fluctuate like other wildlife species, according to the release.

Comments
Add New
sad but natural event
Jenn in MT (68.220.31.xxx) 2009-03-19 09:23:26

Perhaps this will show those so trigger-happy to wipe the wolves out that nature
has a tendancy towards checks and balances. We don't have to worry about lupine
armies coming for our children and homes just yet. ;)

boo hoo
"trigger-happy" Jim (137.88.161.xxx) 2009-03-19 16:36:17

Jenn these killing themselves off or dieing of disease doesnt change what thier
food source is. the wolves that remain will still feed on livestock and still
keep ever elk and deer in wyo and mt run ragged. If you've lived in the area
longer than 15 years I'm sure you've noticed that the wildlife you see has
decreased considerably. Its because of these predators. I dont care if they were
here before us or are a normal part of this ecosystem. we are better off without
them...
not a natural part of our ecosystom?
Ulrich (137.88.161.xxx) 2009-04-29 08:13:30

You say that wolves were not a natural part of this ecosystem? This is false and
everyone knows it. Wolves were here long before humans were. I admit they arent
the same species as the ones that inhabited wyoming before us but they werent
far off. Before you post something its always a good idea to get your facts
straight.
who is right?
Mark (69.146.73.xxx) 2009-03-20 16:37:32

It's too bad that neither side of this completely polarizing issue will ever see
eye to eye. Conservationists like myself seem to only want complete federal
protection for wolves under the ESA(endangered species act) while livestock
owners and hunters generally call for the wiping out of all wolves. Wolves
alone are not responsible for any decline in ungulate populations, but the
anti-wolf side doesn't want to hear those facts. Wolves also are not the only
animals that prey on livestock. I wish there was some type of compromise that
could be reached by both sides to ensure that wolves could remain in their
native, natural habitat, while ranchers and hunters could continue to pursue
their own economic and recreational interests without calling for the complete
removal of wolves. Both sides, myself included, need to grow up and learn you
can't always get everything you want all the time.
The grays need to be shot on site
Syloss (69.144.172.xxx) 2009-03-24 13:52:04

The Canadian gray wolves that were introduced into the greater Yellowstone
ecosystem are neither endangered nor indigenous. The indigenous canines of
this system are the North-American timber wolf and coyote. The North-American
timber wolf is no more related to the Canadian gray wolf then it is the coyote.
The vast differences between these sub-species’ appearance and habit are
enormous.

The North-American timber wolf is darker in color, weighs roughly
25% more than the Canadian gray and normally runs in smaller packs and is often
solitary. The North-American timber wolf has a smaller lung to body ratio,
which makes it less likely to kill for fun.

The North-American timber wolf
is endangered and needs protected. Unfortunately, timber wolves are easily
killed by the more numerous and aggressive grays. The introduction of the grays
has probably caused the total destruction of the Yellowstone timber-wolf
sub-species.

Introducing the Canadian gray wolf into Yellowstone Park
makes as much ecological sense as the introduction of rabbits in Australia. The
grays need to be shot on site or the liberals can take them home either way they
need to go.
Reply to "The grays need to be shot on site"
Anonymous (75.121.128.xxx) 2009-03-25 19:51:44

Allowing people to shot Gray wolves would cause problems because you'd have a
lot of mistakes, a.k.a. a lot of Timber wolves also shot.
JFD (69.142.215.xxx) 2009-04-04 13:57:44

Do some of you have even as much as a nano-clue of what you are
talking about?
The species is Canis lupus.
The Gray wolf is also known as the timber wolf!
The reason that
Canadian wolves were introduced into Yellowstone was because
there were no wolves to be found in the Western US.
If
ignorance is bliss, some of you must be in nirvana.
Thank you for actually knowing what you are talkin
Veterinary Student (69.144.172.xxx) 2010-03-23 09:22:13

Nice to see that some people like "The grays need to be shot on-site" do
NOT do their homework before they start rallying facts off. The cold hard facts
are that if you have a problem with the reintroduction of gray wolves into
Yellowstone you are a r*****. Not only has the reintroduction of wolves helped
Yellowstone's Eco system to thrive it has brought back the balance that was once
their before man decided to go gun crazy and kill animals that had more of a
right to be there then they did. Wolves do not just go after domestic prey.
They're very specific in their kills and will only go after young, old, sick, or
wounded animals. They like when things are vulnerable. As far as a decline of
elk and deer in the Yellowstone region due to wolves. If anyone had taken the
time to do research into Yellowstone you would see that the decline was indeed a
necessity because the hoof-stock were destroying Yellowstone's Eco system. The
trees, the plants, even the water level was lower before the wolves returned.
Perhaps man needs to think a little less about how many sets of antlers to put
on their wall and a little more about the BIG PICTURE. This is NOT our world we
are simply a PART of it.
Don (71.215.129.xxx) 2010-07-07 19:16:28

Those "hoof-stock" are called ungulates and someone who thinks that
wolves only kill the sick and the old should do more homework and less forum
posting. It is "our" world. That is why we put roads through the park
for people to view "our" wolves or deer or elk. Those roads allow us to
drive around with our pets that spread distemper and parvo to those presious
western canadian grey wolves. Most of the trigger happy wolf killers were the
park rangers who were removing the predatious wolves so your sunday drive
through the park would have more "hoof-stock" for you to view, becasue
in "our" world we like little baby ungulates more then we like aspen
groves or willows or beavers.
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 
< Prev   Next >
© 2010 Powell Tribune
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.